The good: Hrithik and the lead actors, Great visuals
The bad: Too long - could have used a lot of edits (At least 30 mins), lots of mindless violence and pointless songs
Look out for: terrific performances by the junior stars
Bottomline: It's never remaking a classic even if the original was made by the same production house. The original Agneepath aimed to take viewers back to Amitabh's golden run at the box office with a film that was reminiscent of his late 70s and early 80s films like Deewar etc. It followed a spate of films like Toofan and Jaadugar where Amitabh was reduced to a caricature of his former self. It worked because it was a 90s version of a typical 70s style plot and it was lifted by a towering performance by Amitabh. I can't think of any other Bollywood star who could filled Amitabh's big shoes other than Hrithik who is terrific as the 2012 version of Vijay Dinanath Chavan directed by Karan Malhotra. The film's central theme remains the same - how a young boy becomes a gangster and returns to avenge the murder of his father. But there's a lot of chop and change with the characters. There's no Krishnan Iyer (Played by Mithun) but there's a new character Rauf Lala (brilliantly essayed by Rishi Kapoor) and there's a more meaner, menacing version of Kaancha played by Sanjay Dutt. There's a lot to like about the new Agneepath - the casting is good, the performances are top class (Especially Hrithik) and the visuals and production values are terrific. But the film's biggest weak link is that its too rooted in a past that 2012 viewers would prefer to forget. Its too long drawn (Almost 3 hours), it has too many songs that are speed breakers, the editing is not sharp and its tough to emphathise with Hrithik's revenge saga after he is busy peddling dope and trafficking young girls.
Running time: 170 mins (Approx)















